Summary
In our earlier instalments, we saw the positive impact of the CoViD market turmoil on the solvency ratio in countries like The Netherlands and Denmark. We have also seen these markets to be highly affected by the Volatility Adjustment (VA). To appreciate why these findings are not a coincidence, it is first important to understand how the VA works.
Download the article here |
Dr Florian Ueltzhöfer
Actuary DAV/IVS
Teoman Kaplan
Actuary DAV
In our earlier instalments, we saw the positive impact of the CoViD market turmoil on the solvency ratio in countries like The Netherlands and Denmark. We have also seen these markets to be highly affected by the Volatility Adjustment (VA). To appreciate why these findings are not a coincidence, it is first important to understand how the VA works.
The VA is calculated based on reference portfolios determined by EIOPA, and updated annually. The EUR-currency portfolio is close to the average asset allocation of the Eurozone insurance market.* Below, on the left, you can see the bucket of investments, and their allocation as it was for most of 2020. Despite 27.9% of the portfolio being non-rate-sensitive, i.e., not contributing to the VA spread at all, we observe below, on the right, that the VA spread has increased from 7 bps as of Dec 2019 to 46 bps by the end of March 2020.
The implementation of the VA was made to counter spread volatility during market turmoil, as many insurers still invest in Fixed Income on a buy-and-maintain basis. When market values drop through spread-widening, the applicable VA increases. Ceteris paribus, the liabilities are calculated with a higher interest rate reducing their market value, and partially compensating the loss on assets. Hence, the volatility of the own funds should be reduced.
Nevertheless, even NL and DK have seen a significant volatility of the own funds, albeit to their benefit. It appears as if the losses and retrievals in the actual investment portfolios were overcompensated by the strong widening and tightening of the VA spread.
To underpin this claim, we would need to thoroughly analyse the balance sheet structure, i.e., the Duration Gap and the asset allocation. On the one hand, the Liability duration is about 14 years** in both markets, whereas the Asset duration is about 5 years (DK) and 9 years (NL) only. On the other hand, French and Italian Govies have a weight of 17% in the representative portfolio, which is quite high compared to the real asset allocation in those two countries. All in all, this principally leads to the massive increase of own funds in Q1 2020. The “overshooting” of the VA applied to the liabilities with a longer spread duration and a greater rate-sensitive balance-sheet ratio decreases the value of the liability relatively stronger than the losses incurred through spread-widening on ratesensitive assets.
This is of course just a very simple deduction. It still might explain most of the effects described. But as always in life there is more than just what is obvious on the surface…
LOOKING FORWARD TO FUTURE DISCUSSIONS ON THIS CHANNEL!
EUR currency VA reference portfolio (2020/21) and monthly VA (Dec 2018 – Dec 2020)
Source: EIOPA, Risk-free interest rate term structures, Monthly technical information Dec 2018 – Dec 2020; own presentation.
* Denmark is using a separate DKK-currency reference portfolio.
** EIOPA, Report on insurers’ asset and liability management in relation to the illiquidity of their liabilities, Dec 2019.
Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it may fall as well as rise and investors might not get back the full amount invested. The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer companies at the time of publication. The data used is derived from various sources, and assumed to be correct and reliable at the time of publication. The conditions of any underlying offer or contract that may have been, or will be, made or concluded, shall prevail. The duplication, publication, or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted; except for the case of explicit permission by Allianz Global Investors GmbH.
For investors in Europe (excluding Switzerland)
This is a marketing communication issued by Allianz Global Investors GmbH, www.allianzgi.com, an investment company with limited liability, incorporated in Germany, with its registered office at Bockenheimer Landstrasse 42-44, 60323 Frankfurt/M, registered with the local court Frankfurt/M under HRB 9340, authorised by Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (www.bafin.de). Allianz Global Investors GmbH has established branches in the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, Luxembourg, Sweden, Belgium and the Netherlands. Contact details and information on the local regulation are available here (www.allianzgi.com/Info).
For investors in Switzerland
This is an advertising document issued by Allianz Global Investors (Schweiz) AG, a 100% subsidiary of Allianz Global Investors GmbH.
Summary
Italy was one of the solvability “losers” during the CoViD crisis. Compared to the other countries whose insurers suffered, Italy is quite different